| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 44.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 34.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock X58 Extreme3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20111031 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 04 '20 at 21:22 |
| Run Duration | 148 Seconds |
| Run User | SWE-User |
| Background CPU | 4% |
PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-950-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.15 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
76.6%
Very good
|
62% 105 Pts
|
50% 398 Pts
|
28% 455 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Asus(1043 8469) 3GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
44.4%
Average
|
44% 55.6 fps
|
46% 57.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT07B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 77 91 86 75 79 MB/s
|
34.2%
Below average
|
22% 103 MB/s
|
62% 20.8 MB/s
|
16% 25 MB/s
|
|
|
921% 4,125 MB/s
|
966% 283 MB/s
|
569% 766 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
112GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 71 71 72 67 71 MB/s
|
32.9%
Below average
|
36% 48.7 MB/s
|
164% 1.17 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 3x4GB
3 of 6 slots used
12GB DIMM
|
47.5%
Average
|
47% 16.3 GB/s
|
36% 12.8 GB/s
|
61% 65.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X58 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 116 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock X58 Extreme3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 31x |
| Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 24x |
| Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples | 11x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 9x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 8x |
| GTX 980-TiNvidia $560Bench 79%, 214,030 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 68% - Good | Total price: $300 |