| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 98% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 21.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20120626 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 03 '20 at 07:05 |
| Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 33% |
PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
61.1%
Good
|
56% 91 Pts
|
34% 268 Pts
|
19% 303 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
MSI(1462 3366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.50
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
98%
Outstanding
|
100% 133 fps
|
94% 116 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
426GB free (System drive)
Firmware: GM4OA5NA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 60 56 28 67 67 MB/s
|
40.9%
Average
|
49% 67.2 MB/s
|
136% 1.03 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Ultra Trek 32GB
25GB free, PID 559f
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s
|
12.5%
Very poor
|
27% 21.2 MB/s
|
112% 2.13 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.5%
Below average
|
32% 11.1 GB/s
|
22% 7.77 GB/s
|
50% 80.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 Extreme3 Builds (Compare 273 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 - $82
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 40x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 39x |
| FX-8120AMDBench 56%, 25,690 samples | 22x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 20x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 14x |
| HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples | 9x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $370 |