Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive240% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX705GM
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180921
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 02 '20 at 22:30
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
92.7% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 126
2-Core 254
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 496
8-Core 841
81% 669 Pts
64-Core 1003
62% 1003 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 92.7%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1B4E) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
50.7% Above average
Lighting 60.9
Reflection 71.9
Parallax 58.4
50% 63.7 fps
MRender 67.8
Gravity 59.4
Splatting 65.9
53% 64.4 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$80
532GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 42A4SANA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1366 1551 1227 1012 967 969 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
240% Outstanding
Read 1,415
Write 1,682
Mixed 110
SusWrite 1,182
246% 1,097 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 66.5
220% 74.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,178
DQ Write 768
DQ Mixed 553
526% 833 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 240%
Great: 372%
Jmicron Tech 512GB
70GB free
Firmware: 0204
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 332
Write 311
Mixed 308
71% 317 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 38.6
4K Mixed 15.2
78% 26.2 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 16.4
DQ Mixed 13.4
22% 44.7 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 89%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
88.9% Excellent
MC Read 32.9
MC Write 34.3
MC Mixed 27.2
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 36.2
SC Mixed 27.6
79% 27.6 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 88.9%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM Builds (Compare 624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705GM_FX705GM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $60
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback