Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot Drive33.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99FX PRO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140407
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 01 '20 at 09:16
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
58.4% Above average
Memory 77.2
1-Core 78
2-Core 123
57% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 355
35% 285 Pts
64-Core 384
24% 384 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 58.4%
Great: 68%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
AMD 2+0 Stripe/RAID0 118GB
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 101 79 26 26 20 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.1% Below average
Read 186
Write 98.5
Mixed 112
SusWrite 58.2
25% 114 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 18.1
64% 21.3 MB/s
DQ Read 63.9
DQ Write 33.7
DQ Mixed 39.4
32% 45.7 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 92%
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
387GB free
Firmware: UH51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 3.5 48 103 125 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
42.6% Average
Read 410
Write 338
Mixed 301
SusWrite 83.3
63% 283 MB/s
4K Read 12.3
4K Write 33.7
4K Mixed 13.9
54% 20 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 98
DQ Mixed 29.2
42% 78.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 58%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
326GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 67 67 69 69 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
48.5% Average
Read 101
Write 92.5
Mixed 82.3
SusWrite 67.7
64% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
127% 1 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 48.5%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
1TB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 89 92 90 93 94 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
60.4% Good
Read 118
Write 104
Mixed 86.7
SusWrite 91.8
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37% Below average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 13.2
MC Mixed 12.4
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.7
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 10.1
25% 8.63 GB/s
Latency 86
46% 86 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 37%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99FX PRO R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,063 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99FX PRO R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 57% - Above average Total price: $610
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback