Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 9% Tree trunk	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	7.45% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	49.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	The RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium D 2.66GHz-$129 394 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	31.5% Below average	Memory 56.2 1-Core 22 2-Core 43.3 29% 40.5 Pts	4-Core 42 8-Core 44.1 6% 43 Pts	64-Core 41.9 3% 41.9 Pts
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 31.5% Great: 34%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R7 250E 10,952 User benchmarks, average bench 8% Gigabyte(1458 2285) 2GB CLim: 720 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.1 Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	7.45% Terrible	Lighting 9.3 Reflection 10.2 Parallax 13 8% 10.8 fps	MRender 7.43 Gravity 8.97 Splatting 9.61 7% 8.67 fps
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 7.45% Great: 10%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra 3D 250GB-$50 5,775 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61110RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 112 168 198 192 185 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	49.6% Average	Read 236 Write 222 Mixed 133 SusWrite 167 42% 189 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 37.5 4K Mixed 26.9 88% 28.9 MB/s	DQ Read 31.5 DQ Write 74.9 DQ Mixed 40.3 34% 48.9 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 106%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 13,169 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 14GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.2 2.5 2.4 2.4 2.4 2.4 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	8.2% Terrible	Read 29 Write 3.8 Mixed 3.8 SusWrite 2.5 9% 9.77 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 1 78% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 8.2% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1x1GB 12,162 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 1 of 2 slots used 1GB DIMM Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	10.3% Very poor	MC Read 3.4 MC Write 2.6 MC Mixed 2.9 8% 2.97 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 2.8 SC Mixed 2.6 8% 2.97 GB/s	Latency 139 29% 139 ns
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 10.3% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16