Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180122
Uptime14.2 Days
Run DateMar 01 '20 at 06:22
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
73.3% Very good
Memory 73.1
1-Core 110
2-Core 220
74% 134 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 784
70% 590 Pts
64-Core 1,087
67% 1,087 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1405 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.8% Above average
Lighting 72.7
Reflection 70.8
Parallax 101
59% 81.5 fps
MRender 71.5
Gravity 74.2
Splatting 58.9
55% 68.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 57.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 1TB 1TB
301GB free
Firmware: P0614D
SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 412 413 413 414 410 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Read 498
Write 410
Mixed 325
SusWrite 410
92% 411 MB/s
4K Read 18.7
4K Write 74.4
4K Mixed 29.8
106% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 221
DQ Mixed 161
126% 170 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 259%
HFS512G39MND-3510A 512GB
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20500P00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 272 349 423 250 372 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 469
Write 422
Mixed 359
SusWrite 335
89% 396 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 37.7
4K Mixed 25.4
83% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 214
DQ Write 142
DQ Mixed 198
142% 184 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
730GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 125 126 126 124 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 118
Write 87.2
Mixed 37.1
SusWrite 123
66% 91.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 96%
WD WD20NPVZ-00W 2TB
533GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 92 95 92 94 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 78.2
Write 76.2
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 91.9
54% 73 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 62%
Hitachi HUS726060ALE610 6TB
947GB free
Firmware: APGNT517
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 203 199 209 209 210 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 185
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 206
115% 159 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.1
106% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 113%
Great: 123%
SanDisk Ext SSD 1TB
274GB free, PID 5589, sandisk extreme 500
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 387
Write 312
Mixed 224
373% 308 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 7.5
538% 8.3 MB/s
Poor: 19% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GBF1X08JEEE36-12-K 8GBF2X04JEEE36-12-K 8GBF1X08JEEE36-12-K 8GBF2X04JEEE36-12-K 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
83.8% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 27.6
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 21
SC Write 33
SC Mixed 26.5
77% 26.8 GB/s
Latency 94.5
42% 94.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING Builds (Compare 938 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 81%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX X370-F GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $745
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback