Asus CG5275

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive17.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (72%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus CG5275  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG5275
Memory0.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100108
Uptime14 Days
Run DateMar 01 '20 at 05:12
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 72%

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5 650-$70
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Memory 36.3
1-Core 50.4
2-Core 76.7
32% 54.5 Pts
4-Core 110
8-Core 106
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 78
5% 78 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
CLim: 1346 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 442.50
Relative performance (0th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 17
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 15.9
14% 15.6 fps
MRender 21.9
Gravity 18.4
Splatting 15.2
15% 18.5 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
86GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 65 91 33 26 25 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.1% Very poor
Read 108
Write 82
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 51.2
17% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 7.7
30% 9.77 MB/s
DQ Read 10.1
DQ Write 16.1
DQ Mixed 12.3
10% 12.8 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 102%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
519GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 583
Write 12
Mixed 17.7
147% 204 MB/s
4K Read 124
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 2
5,407% 42.3 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
876GB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 82
Write 95.5
Mixed 36.3
89% 71.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
69% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 71%
WD My Book 500GB
419GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 10 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
9.43% Terrible
Read 17
Write 16.7
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 11.8
20% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 9.43%
Great: 22%
WD My Book 1TB
157GB free, PID 1100
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 12 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.5% Very poor
Read 17.2
Write 15
Mixed 16.3
SusWrite 12.5
20% 15.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
93% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
18.3% Very poor
MC Read 6.1
MC Write 6
MC Mixed 7.8
19% 6.63 GB/s
SC Read 4.1
SC Write 4.3
SC Mixed 4.4
12% 4.27 GB/s
Latency 220
18% 220 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 18.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CG5275 Builds (Compare 59 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Asus CG5275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $70
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $183Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback