Asus F1A75-M LE

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus F1A75-M LE  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110613
Uptime4.3 Days
Run DateFeb 29 '20 at 22:03
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
FM1 , 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
49.2% Average
Memory 71.5
1-Core 46
2-Core 91.6
45% 69.7 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 120
20% 143 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.9.2
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
54.5% Above average
Lighting 68.7
Reflection 64.7
Parallax 84.1
56% 72.5 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 70.6
Splatting 54.5
52% 64.5 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$90
10GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41110WD
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 162
Write 217
Mixed 83.8
34% 154 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 45.4
4K Mixed 17.4
73% 26.9 MB/s
DQ Read 32
DQ Write 83.9
DQ Mixed 25.2
29% 47 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 100%
WD WD1002FBYS-02A6B0 1TB
99GB free
Firmware: 03.00C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 57 57 59 68 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 70.8
Write 60.5
Mixed 55.2
SusWrite 61.2
46% 61.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38%
Great: 62%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
440GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 57 59 68 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
42% Average
Read 83.2
Write 72.7
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 61.4
44% 60.5 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.3
4K Mixed 1.9
351% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 42%
Great: 112%
Asmt 2105 1TB
292GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 63 63 63 86 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
43.2% Average
Read 83.5
Write 82
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 66.6
54% 73.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
170% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 92%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
270GB free, PID 0100
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 29 29 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 28.5
Write 28.5
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 29.2
36% 26.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.8
39% 13.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.8
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.9
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 97.9
41% 97.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical F1A75-M LE Builds (Compare 47 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus F1A75-M LE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 11% - Very poor Total price: $35
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback