Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Gunboat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	42.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3667U 3,556 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Memory 84.5 1-Core 83.2 2-Core 155 65% 108 Pts	4-Core 180 8-Core 207 25% 193 Pts	64-Core 208 13% 208 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 59%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 1815) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	3.56% Terrible	Lighting 3.9 Reflection 5.19 Parallax 2.91 3% 4 fps	MRender 5.1 Gravity 2.37 Splatting 7.48 4% 4.98 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.56% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 SusWrite @10s intervals: 380 86 113 156 134 134 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	42.5% Average	Read 428 Write 367 Mixed 362 SusWrite 167 74% 331 MB/s	4K Read 17.7 4K Write 11.9 4K Mixed 1.1 34% 10.2 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 14.2 DQ Mixed 21.5 44% 95.8 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 42.5% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8KTF51264HZ-1G9P1 2x4GB 894 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1867 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	57.4% Above average	MC Read 19.6 MC Write 22.2 MC Mixed 18.8 58% 20.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.7 SC Write 16 SC Mixed 16.3 47% 16.3 GB/s	Latency 72.7 55% 72.7 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 57.4% Great: 62%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 50%

Yacht

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	92x

SSD
MZ7PD256HCGM-000H7 256GBSamsungBench 84%, 5,922 samples	10x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	5x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	3x

RAM
HMT351S6EFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 13,765 samples	4x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 27%, 17,632 samples	3x
HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 50%, 25,458 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16