Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (77%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory24.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191119
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 29 '20 at 11:44
Run Duration258 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 77%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3800X-$317
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
61.7% Good
Memory 61.1
1-Core 76.4
2-Core 156
57% 97.8 Pts
4-Core 334
8-Core 686
62% 510 Pts
64-Core 709
48% 709 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Palit(1569 1184) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
43.9% Average
Lighting 138
Reflection 111
Parallax 178
36% 142 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 161
Splatting 92.1
44% 124 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 43%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$130
781GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 859 453 454 453 452 453 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 54% Great: 123%
OCZ Vertex 4 128GB-$215
87GB free
Firmware: 1.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 311 328 327 326 301 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
60.5% Good
Read 303
Write 328
Mixed 230
SusWrite 320
67% 295 MB/s
4K Read 14.2
4K Write 53.2
4K Mixed 19.4
74% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 94.8
DQ Mixed 126
96% 133 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 104%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$86
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC52
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 125 126 126 126 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
80% Very good
Read 153
Write 118
Mixed 72
SusWrite 126
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
121% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 80%
Great: 99%
Seagate Archive HDD 8TB (2015)-$229
3TB free
Firmware: AR15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 158 162 162 162 162 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 96%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 36.7
93% 32.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 17.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 112%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 105%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 126%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $849
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $196Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $365Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $56
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback