MSI B150M MORTAR (MS-7972)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemMSI MS-7972
MotherboardMSI B150M MORTAR (MS-7972)  (all builds)
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150908
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '20 at 19:00
Run Duration218 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-6100-$76
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 71.8
1-Core 112
2-Core 181
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 208
22% 175 Pts
64-Core 202
12% 202 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7350
Sapphire(174B E127) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.3001.0
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.19% Terrible
Lighting 1.37
Reflection 2.04
Parallax 1.66
1% 1.69 fps
MRender 1.9
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 2
1% 1.58 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.19%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 117 52 49 51 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
65% Good
Read 374
Write 344
Mixed 328
SusWrite 81.2
63% 282 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 32.8
106% 35.2 MB/s
DQ Read 310
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 211
172% 247 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 65%
Great: 91%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
268GB free
Firmware: AX101U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 79 79 76 65 77 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
40.6% Average
Read 65.5
Write 70.3
Mixed 29.1
SusWrite 75.8
44% 60.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.5
102% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 57%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
474GB free
Firmware: AX001U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.8 3 2.2 0.9 9.2 0.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 86
Write 87.2
Mixed 32
SusWrite 3.1
38% 52.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 57%
Toshiba MK3265GSX 320GB-$91
298GB free
Firmware: GJ104E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 89 88 86 73 88 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
48.6% Average
Read 84.2
Write 71.5
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 85
48% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.6
113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 48%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E680 500GB
401GB free
Firmware: GG2OAF10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 25 23 20 19 21 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 96
Write 24.1
Mixed 37.3
SusWrite 20.9
33% 44.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.5
91% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 58%
WD Black 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$50
125GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 16 2.1 24 9.4 35 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 74
Write 71.8
Mixed 51
SusWrite 18.3
40% 53.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 26.6%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 24.7
MC Mixed 23.3
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 6.2
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 18.4
38% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 97.3
41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B150M MORTAR (MS-7972) Builds (Compare 1,363 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: MSI B150M MORTAR (MS-7972) - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $551
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback