Today's hottest deals

Asus P8P67 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 88%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 years ago, 7 years ago.
MotherboardAsus P8P67 PRO  (all builds)
Memory21.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJan 08 '17 at 03:11
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 95.3
1-Core 114
2-Core 219
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 564
58% 470 Pts
64-Core 559
35% 559 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 144
Parallax 125
118% 138 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 132
Splatting 91.1
88% 109 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$112
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM03B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 525
Write 488
Mixed 502
113% 505 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 68.6
4K Mixed 40.9
133% 46.2 MB/s
DQ Read 328
DQ Write 287
DQ Mixed 147
154% 254 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 106%
Great: 124%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$175
28GB free
Firmware: DXM06B0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 474
Mixed 502
110% 490 MB/s
4K Read 27.9
4K Write 62.4
4K Mixed 21.8
103% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 291
DQ Mixed 78.4
121% 231 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 116%
Corsair Performance3 SSD 64GB
22GB free
Firmware: 1.0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 332
Write 107
Mixed 160
44% 200 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 12.9
55% 20.5 MB/s
DQ Read 67.5
DQ Write 37.7
DQ Mixed 22
25% 42.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 43%
H/W RAID10 2TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0960 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
67.8% Good
Read 137
Write 97.5
Mixed 79
78% 104 MB/s
4K Read 7.36
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
351% 2.75 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 67.8%
Great: 129%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$97
447GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 106
Write 91.5
Mixed 91.4
72% 96.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.77
4K Write 2.13
4K Mixed 0.44
121% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 85%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$60
140GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 93.6
Write 103
Mixed 97.5
74% 97.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.39
4K Write 1.91
4K Mixed 0.39
95% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 76%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
102GB free
Firmware: 12.01C02 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Read 57.9
Write 52.7
Mixed 52
41% 54.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.06
4K Mixed 0.41
108% 1.01 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-1600C9-8GXM 04CD F3-12800CL8-4GBXM 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM 04CD F3-12800CL8-4GBXM 24GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 4096, 8192, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
MC Read 19.1
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17.8
55% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 18.7
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 56.1
71% 56.1 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 PRO Builds (Compare 1,067 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 PRO - $182

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $801
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback