Asrock Q1900-ITX

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 35% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock Q1900-ITX (all builds)
Memory	4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180326
Uptime	7.4 Days
Run Date	Feb 27 '20 at 10:23
Run Duration	164 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J1900 6,116 User benchmarks, average bench 34% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	38.4% Below average	Memory 62.3 1-Core 22.8 2-Core 45.3 31% 43.5 Pts	4-Core 87.6 8-Core 86.6 12% 87.1 Pts	64-Core 85.9 5% 85.9 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 40%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz) 90,156 User benchmarks, average bench 1% ASRock(1849 0F31) 2.5GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5100 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	0.95% Terrible	Lighting 0.97 Reflection 1.23 Parallax 1 1% 1.07 fps	MRender 1.95 Gravity 0.83 Splatting 1.78 1% 1.52 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.95% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 177 175 199 198 202 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	55% Above average	Read 337 Write 296 Mixed 290 SusWrite 188 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 22.1 4K Write 29.9 4K Mixed 25.3 82% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 86.5 DQ Mixed 23.2 38% 75 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 128%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 82GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 114 118 108 116 112 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 114 Write 108 Mixed 57.5 SusWrite 114 72% 98.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.8 132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 88%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 60,540 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 193GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 115 116 117 117 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 47.3 Write 66.3 Mixed 38.3 SusWrite 115 49% 66.7 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.1 77% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 66%
WD Elements SE 25FE 2TB 1,305 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1TB free, PID 25fe Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 95 93 100 102 102 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	54.4% Above average	Read 132 Write 112 Mixed 82.4 SusWrite 98.6 140% 106 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.4 168% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 54.4% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905469-063.A00LF 2x4GB 73 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.1% Poor	MC Read 9 MC Write 9.2 MC Mixed 9.3 26% 9.17 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 4.4 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 121 33% 121 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 55%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Q1900-ITX Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 32%

Sail boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Q1900-ITX

CPU
Celeron J1900IntelBench 34%, 6,116 samples	43x

GPU
HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 90,156 samples	43x

SSD
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $37Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	5x
850 Evo 120GBSamsung $80Bench 96%, 69,224 samples	4x
Solid State Disk 60GBSpccBench 52%, 2,308 samples	3x

RAM
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	5x
CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GBCrucialBench 38%, 4,853 samples	4x
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 30,280 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $37

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16