HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84FD
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190820
Uptime5 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '20 at 03:05
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 19%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700-$260
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 73.1
1-Core 127
2-Core 265
83% 155 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 841
84% 685 Pts
64-Core 759
47% 759 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 99%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
HP(103C 8556) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 431.60
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.5% Poor
Lighting 5.83
Reflection 75.2
Parallax 68.7
5% 49.9 fps
MRender 84.9
Gravity 72.3
Splatting 65.6
60% 74.3 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB
6GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20120006
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 871
Write 1,040
Mixed 345
167% 752 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 52.1
164% 61.8 MB/s
DQ Read 795
DQ Write 1,104
DQ Mixed 734
615% 878 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 197%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
922GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 183 186 186 186 184 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 166
Mixed 98.7
SusWrite 184
115% 157 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
231% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
117GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 89 88 90 90 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 87.3
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 89
61% 82.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP26D4U9D8ME-16X 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
39.4% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 9.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 94.4
42% 94.4 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx Builds (Compare 6,045 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer

System: HP OMEN by HP Obelisk Desktop 875-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $343
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback