Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.76% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL X99
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190828
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '20 at 22:01
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v3
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Memory 67.1
1-Core 55.5
2-Core 111
48% 78 Pts
4-Core 222
8-Core 426
38% 324 Pts
64-Core 816
50% 816 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 0939) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
7.76% Terrible
Lighting 8.83
Reflection 9.27
Parallax 6.19
7% 8.1 fps
MRender 12.1
Gravity 9.83
Splatting 10.6
9% 10.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 7.76%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST1000VM002-1CT162 1TB
856GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SC12
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 129 129 149 155 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 154
Write 152
Mixed 71
SusWrite 125
92% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 98%
General UDisk 7GB
7GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 4.1 4.1 3.8 4.1 4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
2.42% Terrible
Read 10.5
Write 2
Mixed 5.7
SusWrite 3.9
6% 5.53 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.42%
Great: 6%
Generic Flash Disk 2GB
2GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 5 4.9 4.8 5 5.1 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
2.28% Terrible
Read 8.2
Write 3
Mixed 4.5
SusWrite 4.9
6% 5.15 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.28%
Great: 8%
VendorCo ProductCode 32GB
4GB free, PID 1234
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.5 0.3 0.4 3.3 0.4 0.5 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 15.8
Write 0.7
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 0.9
4% 4.78 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.3% Poor
MC Read 11.4
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.7
28% 9.97 GB/s
SC Read 4.9
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 6.1
18% 6.4 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 28.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical string Builds (Compare 14,489 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback