Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DK_X412DK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics9.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive155% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X412DK_X412DK  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X412DK
Memory2.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '20 at 16:37
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
65.8% Good
Memory 69.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 197
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 516
52% 425 Pts
64-Core 491
30% 491 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon 540X
Asus(1043 1F5E) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.2.1
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
9.8% Terrible
Lighting 12.2
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 15.4
10% 13.5 fps
MRender 10.4
Gravity 10.5
Splatting 13.1
10% 11.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.8%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1102 256GB
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20180000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 460 408 401 379 401 333 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
155% Outstanding
Read 1,178
Write 1,122
Mixed 994
SusWrite 397
207% 923 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 46.7
172% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 779
DQ Write 589
DQ Mixed 416
384% 595 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 155%
Great: 169%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
65.1% Good
MC Read 23.8
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 21.9
65% 22.8 GB/s
SC Read 18.7
SC Write 28
SC Mixed 21.8
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback