Lenovo 20EGW541US

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics4.42% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20EGW541US  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EGW541US
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181114
Uptime2.3 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '20 at 14:32
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4810MQ-$400
CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 216
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 561
57% 461 Pts
64-Core 565
35% 565 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Legend(17AA 221E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5058
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.42% Terrible
Lighting 4.4
Reflection 6.23
Parallax 7.72
4% 6.12 fps
MRender 10.1
Gravity 2.67
Splatting 8.91
6% 7.24 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.42%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7TE256HMHP-000L7 256GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT09L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 233 252 255 254 254 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
69.1% Good
Read 362
Write 256
Mixed 176
SusWrite 244
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 20.3
86% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 79.4
122% 233 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.1%
Great: 91%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown Samsung M471B5173DB0-YK0 1315 0467 RMT3170EB68E9W1600 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.6% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 15.9
54% 18.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 19.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 82.6
48% 82.6 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback