Razer Blade Stealth 13 Late 2019

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 80% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 19% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	268% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

CPU throttled at 86% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

System	Razer Blade Stealth 13 Late 2019 (all builds)
Motherboard	Razer LY320
Memory	9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190910
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '20 at 21:53
Run Duration	109 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%
CPU Throttled	86%

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-1065G7 58,314 User benchmarks, average bench 53% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	59.4% Above average	Memory 71.1 1-Core 128 2-Core 239 80% 146 Pts	4-Core 258 8-Core 474 44% 366 Pts	64-Core 491 30% 491 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 59.4% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Device(1A58 1001) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.7060 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	16.1% Very poor	Lighting 17.6 Reflection 51.9 Parallax 11.7 14% 27.1 fps	MRender 19.1 Gravity 17.9 Splatting 30.8 19% 22.6 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 13%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB 80,540 User benchmarks, average bench 217% 405GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1708 800 599 601 604 603 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	268% Outstanding	Read 2,240 Write 1,809 Mixed 1,347 SusWrite 819 346% 1,554 MB/s	4K Read 60 4K Write 138 4K Mixed 79.8 266% 92.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,109 DQ Write 928 DQ Mixed 1,006 757% 1,014 MB/s
Poor: 130% ↑ This bench: 268% Great: 296%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GB 7,828 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 3733 MHz Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	MC Read 45.7 MC Write 45.7 MC Mixed 40.2 125% 43.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.2 SC Write 36.3 SC Mixed 26.7 74% 26.1 GB/s	Latency 98.8 40% 98.8 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Blade Stealth 13 Late 2019 Builds (Compare 264 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 63%

Destroyer

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

System: Razer Blade Stealth 13 Late 2019

CPU
Core i7-1065G7IntelBench 53%, 58,314 samples	264x

GPU
Iris Plus G7IntelBench 9%, 52,498 samples	142x
GTX 1650 (Mobile Max-Q)NvidiaBench 36%, 6,904 samples	90x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	5x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	67x
CA3-8D512 512GBLiteonBench 168%, 4,424 samples	53x
MZVLB512HBJQ-00A00 512GBSamsungBench 231%, 4,252 samples	33x

RAM
K4UBE3D4AA-MGCL 2x8GBSamsungBench 104%, 7,828 samples	256x
2x8GBMicronBench 83%, 3,676 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16