Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive	91.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	67.3% Good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 75.4 2-Core 150 65% 106 Pts	4-Core 228 8-Core 442 40% 335 Pts	64-Core 440 27% 440 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 67.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209 161,132 User benchmarks, average bench 26% Zotac(19DA 4265) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 1600 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.19 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 24% Great: 28%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 198GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 303 305 309 305 308 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Read 484 Write 439 Mixed 380 SusWrite 316 91% 405 MB/s	4K Read 38.5 4K Write 49.1 4K Mixed 41.9 138% 43.2 MB/s	DQ Read 276 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 187 150% 213 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 172GB free Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 956 1042 677 591 592 587 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	183% Outstanding	Read 1,343 Write 1,054 Mixed 1,069 SusWrite 741 236% 1,052 MB/s	4K Read 57.7 4K Write 74.6 4K Mixed 64 209% 65.4 MB/s	DQ Read 614 DQ Write 232 DQ Mixed 348 277% 398 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 183% Great: 340%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	50% Average	MC Read 20.1 MC Write 15.5 MC Mixed 17.4 50% 17.7 GB/s	SC Read 10.8 SC Write 9.1 SC Mixed 14.1 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 62.8 64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 50% Great: 61%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 34%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 28%

Raft

Value: 71% - Very good

Total price: $440

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16