Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.35% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 79% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NP530U3C-A07IT
Memory	6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120920
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 25 '20 at 18:05
Run Duration	135 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	42%
CPU Throttled	79%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3517U 8,454 User benchmarks, average bench 51% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 1.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Memory 78.2 1-Core 78.9 2-Core 78.9 53% 78.7 Pts	4-Core 131 8-Core 130 18% 131 Pts	64-Core 127 8% 127 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz) 409,110 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C0D7) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4242 Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	3.35% Terrible	Lighting 3.5 Reflection 5.19 Parallax 2.88 3% 3.86 fps	MRender 5.38 Gravity 2.3 Splatting 7.3 4% 5 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.35% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk i100 24GB 942 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 22GB free Firmware: 11.56.04 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 79 81 80 83 82 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	29.5% Poor	Read 347 Write 81.2 Mixed 86 SusWrite 80.7 32% 149 MB/s	4K Read 11.9 4K Write 8.9 4K Mixed 7.9 33% 9.57 MB/s	DQ Read 26.2 DQ Write 8.4 DQ Mixed 10.2 9% 14.9 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 31%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 209GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 304 305 306 305 306 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	85.6% Excellent	Read 446 Write 426 Mixed 361 SusWrite 319 87% 388 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 50.3 4K Mixed 31.2 105% 35.7 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 311 243% 337 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 85.6% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GB 276 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	49.4% Average	MC Read 17.7 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 17.4 51% 18 GB/s	SC Read 11.2 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 11.7 32% 11.1 GB/s	Latency 83.9 48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C Builds (Compare 189 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 530U3C/530U4C/532U3C

CPU
Core i5-3317UIntel $225Bench 47%, 26,848 samples	95x
Core i3-3217UIntelBench 43%, 28,188 samples	38x
Core i7-3517UIntelBench 51%, 8,454 samples	32x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	167x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	16x
GeForce GT620MNvidiaBench 3%, 886 samples	5x

SSD
i100 24GBSandiskBench 28%, 942 samples	20x
MZMTD128HAFV-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 47%, 2,350 samples	8x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x

RAM
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 29%, 808 samples	39x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F BA92-09550A 6GBElpidaBench 41%, 139 samples	11x
EBJ41UF8BDU0-GN-F Samsung M471B5273EB0-CK0 8GBElpidaBench 49%, 276 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 50% - Above average

Total price: $225

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16