Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.03% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	30.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2540M-$315 16,964 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Memory 89.3 1-Core 87.1 2-Core 147 66% 108 Pts	4-Core 210 8-Core 210 28% 210 Pts	64-Core 210 13% 210 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia NVS 4200M 6,825 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Dell(1028 0493) 512MB CLim: 740 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 512MB, Driver: 392.58 Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	2.03% Terrible	Lighting 2.43 Reflection 2.92 Parallax 1.91 2% 2.42 fps	MRender 3.14 Gravity 2.23 Splatting 2.48 2% 2.62 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.03% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2018)-$59 69,933 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: UE510000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 3.6 92 60 73 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Read 401 Write 272 Mixed 283 SusWrite 75.4 57% 258 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 20 4K Mixed 0.9 29% 10.7 MB/s	DQ Read 59.2 DQ Write 51.4 DQ Mixed 1.5 16% 37.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351S6CFR8C-PB 2x4GB 25,458 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	57.6% Above average	MC Read 20.7 MC Write 21.3 MC Mixed 18.4 58% 20.1 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 16.5 SC Mixed 16.6 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 68.1 59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 57.6% Great: 58%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 48%

Yacht

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	1,632x
NVS 4200MNvidiaBench 2%, 6,825 samples	355x
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	149x

RAM
M471B5273DH0-CH9 2x4GBSamsungBench 43%, 15,815 samples	76x
M471B5773DH0-CH9 2x2GBSamsungBench 37%, 7,983 samples	73x
HMT351S6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 43%, 6,386 samples	64x

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $62

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16