Asus P8B75-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics41.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
MotherboardAsus P8B75-M  (all builds)
Memory12.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140806
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '20 at 21:40
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$184
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 89.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 197
78% 130 Pts
4-Core 405
8-Core 526
61% 466 Pts
64-Core 525
35% 525 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
41.4% Average
Lighting 190
Reflection 143
Parallax 155
50% 163 fps
MRender 93.4
Gravity 154
Splatting 115
41% 121 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 43%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Adata SU635 240GB
140GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V8X01c89
SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 67 70 71 72 72 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
36.8% Below average
Read 188
Write 247
Mixed 196
SusWrite 68.9
40% 175 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 34.5
4K Mixed 22.5
75% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 19.8
DQ Write 55
DQ Mixed 28.3
24% 34.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 87%
WD Red 8TB (2017)-$214
102GB free
Firmware: 81.00A81
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 69 69 70 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 135
Write 136
Mixed 71.5
SusWrite 68.8
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 1.4
358% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 113%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$105
19GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 69 69 69 70 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 79
Write 71.3
Mixed 48.7
SusWrite 68.8
49% 66.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 100%
WD WD20EFAX-68FB5N0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 172 173 173 176 173 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 20% Great: 117%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$105
23GB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 70 71 72 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 67.2
Write 73.5
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 71.2
50% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 8GBH2X04H1AA28-16 04CD F3-2133C11-8GXL 01BA 8GBH2X04H1AA28-16 04CD F3-2133C11-8GXL 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 17.2
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50%
Great: 50%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 4,343 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $879
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $196Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $365Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback