Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-7020U 28,454 User benchmarks, average bench 40% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Memory 63.8 1-Core 70.5 2-Core 66.3 45% 66.9 Pts	4-Core 67.8 8-Core 67.8 9% 67.8 Pts	64-Core 68.9 4% 68.9 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 53%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GB 8,741 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: X6103006 SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 108 108 108 107 109 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	65.5% Good	Read 400 Write 147 Mixed 196 SusWrite 111 47% 213 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 49 4K Mixed 30.5 104% 35.1 MB/s	DQ Read 280 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 208 162% 225 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 65.5% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CRC 1x4GB 10,211 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.5% Poor	MC Read 7.6 MC Write 8.3 MC Mixed 9.3 24% 8.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 8.6 SC Mixed 6.3 24% 8.37 GB/s	Latency 117 34% 117 ns
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 52%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)IntelBench 5%, 420,154 samples	2,165x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,684x
MX110NvidiaBench 6%, 6,322 samples	297x

SSD
SD9SN8W-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 69%, 8,741 samples	130x
Optane+932GBHDD 1TBIntelBench 59%, 6,924 samples	121x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	101x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CTD 1x4GBSamsungBench 30%, 48,985 samples	636x
RMSA3260NA78HAF-2400 1x8GBRamaxelBench 36%, 7,851 samples	374x
8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GBMicronBench 40%, 38,499 samples	359x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16