PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 85.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP PPPPP-CCC#MMMMMMMM (all builds) |
Motherboard | MSI 2A9C |
Memory | 12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100519 |
Uptime | 6.5 Days |
Run Date | Feb 23 '20 at 21:00 |
Run Duration | 117 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
69.6%
Good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
85.2%
Excellent
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 83 124 128 120 127 MB/s
|
77.5%
Very good
|
|||
WD easystore 25FB 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 25fb
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 28 28 28 28 28 MB/s
|
18.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
CD04CD04 RipjawsX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
41.5%
Average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples | 49x |
Core i3 550Intel $110Bench 47%, 19,058 samples | 41x |
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples | 39x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples | 29x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 15x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 14x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $98 |