Acer Predator G3620

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	5.95% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	71.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Acer Predator G3620 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Predator G3620
Memory	4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120312
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 23 '20 at 11:11
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	IDN-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	77.3% Very good	Memory 84.2 1-Core 101 2-Core 183 72% 122 Pts	4-Core 386 8-Core 515 57% 450 Pts	64-Core 516 32% 516 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 77.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640 34,519 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Sapphire(174B 0640) 3GB CLim: 720 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 385.69 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	5.95% Terrible	Lighting 6.6 Reflection 8 Parallax 5.06 5% 6.55 fps	MRender 8.81 Gravity 6.77 Splatting 9.87 7% 8.48 fps
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.95% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 187GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 239 242 242 241 241 MB/s Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	71.4% Very good	Read 243 Write 238 Mixed 237 SusWrite 239 54% 239 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 52.1 4K Mixed 38.2 122% 40.2 MB/s	DQ Read 203 DQ Write 190 DQ Mixed 196 147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 71.4% Great: 128%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 224GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 51 49 49 54 52 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 112 Write 33 Mixed 40.5 SusWrite 50.4 43% 59 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.2 73% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 174 178 178 178 177 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 185 Write 158 Mixed 78.8 SusWrite 177 109% 150 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 2x4GB 2,338 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	49.9% Average	MC Read 18.3 MC Write 17.5 MC Mixed 15.9 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 15.6 SC Mixed 14.2 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 49.9% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Predator G3620 Builds (Compare 386 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 17%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator G3620

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	257x
Core i5-3350PIntel $60Bench 65%, 21,413 samples	55x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	48x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	34x
GeForce GT 640NvidiaBench 6%, 34,519 samples	29x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $54Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	15x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	14x
LCT-128M3S 128GBLiteonitBench 67%, 2,346 samples	14x

RAM
ACR512X64D3U16C11G 3x4GBKingstonBench 41%, 216 samples	24x
HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 48%, 7,511 samples	20x
NT4GC64B8HG0NF-CG 2x4GBNanyaBench 47%, 2,338 samples	15x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $521

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16