Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 112% UFO	Desktop 105% UFO	Workstation 124% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	316% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	27 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190929
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 23 '20 at 11:04
Run Duration	262 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395 197,342 User benchmarks, average bench 88% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Memory 89.9 1-Core 156 2-Core 303 100% 183 Pts	4-Core 611 8-Core 1,192 107% 902 Pts	64-Core 2,142 133% 2,142 Pts
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 97%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% MSI(1462 3362) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.37 Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Lighting 140 Reflection 147 Parallax 138 114% 142 fps	MRender 111 Gravity 135 Splatting 105 95% 117 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 110%
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% MSI(1462 8C93) 1GB CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 442.37 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.59% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 4.27 Parallax 4.12 3% 4.2 fps	MRender 3.76 Gravity 3.9 Splatting 6.13 4% 4.6 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.59% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150 105,037 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 261GB free Firmware: M0CR040 SusWrite @10s intervals: 450 454 286 253 253 253 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Read 402 Write 247 Mixed 310 SusWrite 325 72% 321 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 92.8 4K Mixed 39.9 141% 53.1 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 200 150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 99%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 238GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1070 880 882 880 878 868 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	316% Outstanding	Read 2,591 Write 1,859 Mixed 1,704 SusWrite 910 394% 1,766 MB/s	4K Read 70.6 4K Write 169 4K Mixed 96.5 320% 112 MB/s	DQ Read 1,362 DQ Write 1212 DQ Mixed 1,278 961% 1,284 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 316% Great: 355%
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 500GB-$113 27,087 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 275GB free Firmware: X61190WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 466 396 398 394 395 400 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 510 Write 481 Mixed 404 SusWrite 408 101% 451 MB/s	4K Read 40 4K Write 109 4K Mixed 52.9 186% 67.3 MB/s	DQ Read 285 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 265 204% 278 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 116%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$37 339,020 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 45GB free Firmware: 600ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 88 96 96 99 84 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	63% Good	Read 265 Write 124 Mixed 164 SusWrite 91 36% 161 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 88.9 4K Mixed 38.8 135% 51 MB/s	DQ Read 95.1 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 97.4 77% 105 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 63% Great: 73%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141 42,930 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 108GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 367 368 369 366 368 367 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	95% Outstanding	Read 508 Write 365 Mixed 342 SusWrite 368 89% 396 MB/s	4K Read 28.9 4K Write 86.1 4K Mixed 40.4 141% 51.8 MB/s	DQ Read 206 DQ Write 172 DQ Mixed 160 128% 179 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 95% Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 127 127 125 126 125 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Read 125 Write 92.5 Mixed 64.7 SusWrite 125 75% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB 73,741 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	124% Outstanding	MC Read 50 MC Write 45.2 MC Mixed 44.1 133% 46.4 GB/s	SC Read 28.1 SC Write 26.7 SC Mixed 41.1 91% 32 GB/s	Latency 67.4 59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 124% Great: 134%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $193

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,305x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $149Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	868x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	833x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	570x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	514x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	402x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	339x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	271x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $933

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16