| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock EP2C602 (all builds) |
| Memory | 48 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180412 |
| Uptime | 8.2 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 23 '20 at 03:15 |
| Run Duration | 144 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 1% |
PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 0
CPUSocket, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
74.8%
Very good
|
69% 118 Pts
|
61% 515 Pts
|
105% 1,691 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.7%
Average
|
48% 60.1 fps
|
47% 58.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130
298GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 36 36 36 36 36 MB/s
|
||||
|
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
626GB free
Firmware: 023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 281 279 280 280 281 MB/s
|
79.9%
Very good
|
89% 397 MB/s
|
108% 35.1 MB/s
|
175% 236 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
640GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 138 137 138 138 136 MB/s
|
76.9%
Very good
|
84% 114 MB/s
|
137% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 9965516-477.A 2x31.5GB
2 of 8 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.1%
Poor
|
25% 8.77 GB/s
|
19% 6.7 GB/s
|
55% 72.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical EP2C602 Builds (Compare 38 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock EP2C602
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples | 8x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples | 8x |
| CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2690 01stBench 68%, 2,388 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples | 5x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 5x |
| Quadro M4000NvidiaBench 32%, 9,043 samples | 3x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 123% - Outstanding | Total price: $200 |