MSI MS-16GC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
3 months ago, 3 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star GE60 2OC\2OD\2OE
MotherboardMSI MS-16GC  (all builds)
Memory1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 22 '20 at 10:52
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User BLR-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 91.8
1-Core 97.6
2-Core 165
73% 118 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 497
53% 413 Pts
64-Core 501
34% 501 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 78%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow mS200 mSATA 60GB-$59
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 60AABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 103 95 105 106 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Read 308
Write 126
Mixed 171
SusWrite 104
39% 177 MB/s
4K Read 26.9
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 23.7
104% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 95.5
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 118
87% 114 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 66%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$37
464GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 110 110 110 110 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 102
Write 109
Mixed 56.4
SusWrite 110
69% 94 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
147% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston RB16D3LS1KBG/4G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
29.4% Poor
MC Read 10.2
MC Write 9.2
MC Mixed 7.6
26% 9 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.3
27% 9.43 GB/s
Latency 64.5
62% 64.5 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 32%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical MS-16GC Builds (Compare 1,271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI MS-16GC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $209
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $199Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $500Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $240
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback