Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 28% Raft	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3450 6,637 User benchmarks, average bench 27% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	26.6% Poor	Memory 36 1-Core 27.4 2-Core 75.8 27% 46.4 Pts	4-Core 94 8-Core 145 15% 120 Pts	64-Core 154 10% 154 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 26.6% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 500 7,914 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262 Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	1.49% Terrible	Lighting 1.63 Reflection 2.19 Parallax 1.34 1% 1.72 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 1.5 Splatting 2.57 2% 2.13 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.49% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NT-512 512GB 740 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 439GB free (System drive) Firmware: T180731 SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 309 328 326 338 331 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	64% Good	Read 318 Write 331 Mixed 314 SusWrite 318 72% 320 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 31.3 4K Mixed 16.7 79% 24.9 MB/s	DQ Read 200 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 202 148% 194 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 64% Great: 110%
SDHC Card 32GB 13,791 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 30GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 14 14 15 15 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	8.56% Terrible	Read 23.7 Write 16.2 Mixed 16 SusWrite 14.6 23% 17.6 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 1.1 62% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.56% Great: 33%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x3GB 487 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 2 of 2 slots used 6GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	23.5% Poor	MC Read 8.1 MC Write 10.3 MC Mixed 8.9 26% 9.1 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3.5 10% 3.53 GB/s	Latency 222 18% 222 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 23.5% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 28%

Raft

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3450IntelBench 27%, 6,637 samples	26x
Celeron N4020IntelBench 21%, 5,047 samples	10x
Celeron N4100IntelBench 33%, 6,492 samples	9x

GPU
HD Graphics 500IntelBench 1%, 7,914 samples	35x
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	20x
Iris Graphics 550IntelBench 8%, 819 samples	3x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16