Toshiba SATELLITE L850-11Q

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive80.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L850-11Q  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name1
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '20 at 12:39
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 88
1-Core 88.7
2-Core 158
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 404
47% 366 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7600M
Toshiba(1179 FB31) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.16% Terrible
Lighting 6.73
Reflection 6.5
Parallax 5.31
6% 6.18 fps
MRender 5.71
Gravity 4.77
Splatting 5.91
4% 5.46 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.16%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 284 279 299 309 303 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
80.4% Excellent
Read 393
Write 314
Mixed 243
SusWrite 292
70% 310 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 66.4
4K Mixed 33.2
110% 40.4 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 174
160% 245 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 80.4%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 22.2
MC Write 20.1
MC Mixed 18.1
58% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 17.1
48% 16.8 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback