Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics57.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive110% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '20 at 04:52
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 95.1
1-Core 151
2-Core 299
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 596
8-Core 1,172
105% 884 Pts
64-Core 1,166
72% 1,166 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 103%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 85A6) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
57.2% Above average
Lighting 70.8
Reflection 73.8
Parallax 63.8
58% 69.5 fps
MRender 68.3
Gravity 67.1
Splatting 69.7
56% 68.4 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
212GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 442 416 388 381 361 367 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 453
Mixed 399
SusWrite 392
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 44.9
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 53.6
173% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 280
200% 264 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 110%
Great: 134%
SanDisk SSD Plus 120GB-$42
14GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 42 32 32 32 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 342
Write 39
Mixed 62.5
SusWrite 36
26% 120 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 42
4K Mixed 5.6
66% 23.8 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 79.9
DQ Mixed 5.7
39% 94.1 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 78%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 178 189 182 179 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
Read 131
Write 153
Mixed 72.2
SusWrite 183
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 0.9
260% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
102GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 127 130 131 129 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 154
Write 124
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 130
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
MC Read 31.4
MC Write 30.5
MC Mixed 23.2
81% 28.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 24.6
69% 24.3 GB/s
Latency 56.7
71% 56.7 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,310 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback