IBM BladeCenter HS22 -[7870AC1]-

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Memory96GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 96GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemIBM BladeCenter HS22 -[7870AC1]-  (all builds)
MotherboardIBM 68Y8163
Memory27.9 GB free of 96 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110207
Uptime103.1 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '20 at 20:14
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5650
Node 1 Socket 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
69.7% Good
Memory 91.2
1-Core 63.6
2-Core 118
58% 90.9 Pts
4-Core 262
8-Core 439
43% 350 Pts
64-Core 993
61% 993 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 71%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lsilogic Logical Volume 999GB
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 29 25 28 28 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Poor: 31% Great: 38%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12x8GB
12 of 12 slots used
96GB DIMM
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.1% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 16.4
49% 17 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 7.7
19% 6.77 GB/s
Latency 65.5
61% 65.5 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.1%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $46
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback