HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics70.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive84.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 1850
Memory28.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180322
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '20 at 20:07
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A10-6800K APU (2013 D.Ri)-$467
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
56.8% Above average
Memory 75.3
1-Core 75.9
2-Core 145
59% 98.6 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 212
30% 219 Pts
64-Core 217
13% 217 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2126 MHz, MLim: 2053 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
70.7% Very good
Lighting 83.4
Reflection 96.4
Parallax 79.8
68% 86.5 fps
MRender 91.6
Gravity 85
Splatting 98.9
76% 91.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct2000mx 50 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 301 331 353 368 369 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 455
Write 346
Mixed 348
SusWrite 329
83% 370 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 34.1
122% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 176
136% 187 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 113%
Ct120bx3 0 120GB
33GB free
Firmware: M2CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 246 296 325 349 363 363 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 464
Write 348
Mixed 366
SusWrite 324
84% 375 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 56.9
4K Mixed 34.2
124% 41.4 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 166
DQ Mixed 190
142% 191 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 107%
Samsung Flash Drive FIT 128GB
86GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 43 43 48 43 43 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
75% Very good
Read 234
Write 72
Mixed 91
SusWrite 44.3
122% 110 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 9.3
4K Mixed 8.5
650% 9.9 MB/s
DQ Read 15.8
DQ Write 16.8
DQ Mixed 10.6
991% 14.4 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 75%
Great: 117%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
K 9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.1% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 11.4
31% 11 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 10.7
24% 8.47 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Compaq Pro 6305 SFF Builds (Compare 480 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq Pro 6305 SFF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback