Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 74% Battleship	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 85% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	68.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (67%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	32.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180803
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 18 '20 at 16:41
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	HRV-User
Background CPU	67%

PC Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-7900X-$455 19,432 User benchmarks, average bench 82% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	63.7% Good	Memory 75.3 1-Core 103 2-Core 151 66% 110 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 545 49% 413 Pts	64-Core 1775 110% 1775 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 120F) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	107% Outstanding	Lighting 146 Reflection 176 Parallax 180 119% 167 fps	MRender 92.1 Gravity 159 Splatting 87.3 90% 113 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 500GB-$67 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 72GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61130WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 307 284 281 278 220 152 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Read 419 Write 390 Mixed 198 SusWrite 254 70% 315 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 78.1 4K Mixed 27 110% 42.5 MB/s	DQ Read 34.8 DQ Write 90 DQ Mixed 136 82% 86.8 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 117%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 440GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 106 107 107 104 104 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	61.7% Good	Read 110 Write 100 Mixed 31.6 SusWrite 105 63% 86.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 61.7% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 4x16GB 809 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2934 MHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 36 MC Write 56.6 MC Mixed 32.9 120% 41.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.6 SC Write 23.1 SC Mixed 10.4 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 89.7 45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 127%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	179x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	133x
Core i9-7900XIntel $455Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	81x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	68x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,131

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16