MSI Z170A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM EDITION

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemMSI MS-7968
MotherboardMSI Z170A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM EDITION  (all builds)
Memory29.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180626
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '20 at 23:12
Run Duration294 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82.7% Excellent
Memory 86
1-Core 122
2-Core 238
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 452
61% 456 Pts
64-Core 452
28% 452 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 82.7%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1386 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.3
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
54.7% Above average
Lighting 67.8
Reflection 72.7
Parallax 86.5
55% 75.7 fps
MRender 72.3
Gravity 68.7
Splatting 58.9
54% 66.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 250GB
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 286 286 287 286 288 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 488
Write 298
Mixed 302
SusWrite 286
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 24.9
143% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 279
DQ Write 278
DQ Mixed 186
165% 248 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 126%
SanDisk Extreme 240GB-$200
184GB free
Firmware: R201
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 197 189 195 196 192 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Read 397
Write 252
Mixed 266
SusWrite 194
62% 277 MB/s
4K Read 35.5
4K Write 92.8
4K Mixed 41.2
156% 56.5 MB/s
DQ Read 299
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 232
182% 252 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 91%
SanDisk Extreme Pro 240GB-$79
221GB free
Firmware: X21100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 456 458 473 474 475 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 473
Write 451
Mixed 283
SusWrite 448
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 96.7
4K Mixed 40.9
155% 57.2 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 159
155% 245 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 107%
Great: 114%
SAMSUNG HD154UI 1.5TB
205GB free, PID 0475
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.5 9.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
12.8% Very poor
Read 39.6
Write 29.7
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 9.4
35% 27.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.8%
Great: 20%
JMicron 500GB
155GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.7 4.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.4% Very poor
Read 38.7
Write 22.2
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 4.6
29% 23.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 10.4%
Great: 26%
JMicron 1TB
582GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 4.8 4.6 4.9 4.7 4.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
11.2% Very poor
Read 39.4
Write 35.4
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 4.7
36% 27.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 151%
WDC WD40 EFRX-68WT0N0 4TB
3TB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.4 4.3 4.5 4.3 4.5 5.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
12.4% Very poor
Read 39.2
Write 35.4
Mixed 33.7
SusWrite 4.5
36% 28.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.4%
Great: 21%
ST3000DM 008-2DM166 3TB
2.5TB free, PID 2352
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.4 4.7 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12.9% Very poor
Read 40.5
Write 35.5
Mixed 29.7
SusWrite 4.5
35% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 18%
WD My Book 1140 2TB
377GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 9.3 9.4 9.4 9.4 9.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Read 39.6
Write 34.9
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 9.3
37% 28.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 49%
WD My Book 1140 3TB
139GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 9.3 9.4 9.3 9.4 9.4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
13.4% Very poor
Read 38.9
Write 34.2
Mixed 30.9
SusWrite 9.3
36% 28.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
85% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 13.4%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown DDR4 3200 2OZ 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.9% Very good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 29.2
MC Mixed 25.8
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 25.6
SC Mixed 23.1
62% 21.8 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 76.9%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM EDITION(MS-7968) Builds (Compare 508 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI Z170A XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM EDITION - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 40% - Average Total price: $1,380
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback