Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	3.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	31.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4000M-$259 7,973 User benchmarks, average bench 51% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	60% Good	Memory 94.3 1-Core 60.3 2-Core 104 57% 86.3 Pts	4-Core 152 8-Core 159 21% 155 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 60% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz) 258,091 User benchmarks, average bench 3% HP(103C 217A) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624 Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	3.49% Terrible	Lighting 3.67 Reflection 6.27 Parallax 6.09 3% 5.34 fps	MRender 6.24 Gravity 2.17 Splatting 7.26 4% 5.22 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.49% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 203GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 110 120 120 125 103 MB/s Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	31.1% Below average	Read 198 Write 179 Mixed 101 SusWrite 126 34% 151 MB/s	4K Read 13.2 4K Write 16.8 4K Mixed 6.8 38% 12.3 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 90.1 DQ Mixed 24.5 39% 75.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 31.1% Great: 55%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5173QH0-YK0 8GB 203 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	45% Average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 14.6 44% 15.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.7 SC Write 11.7 SC Mixed 11.4 32% 11.3 GB/s	Latency 58.9 68% 58.9 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 45% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16