Fujitsu CELSIUS M730

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 72% Battleship	Workstation 13% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Fujitsu CELSIUS M730 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3128-A2
Memory	11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180628
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 17 '20 at 07:37
Run Duration	155 Seconds
Run User	SRB-User
Background CPU	19%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v2-$345 10,301 User benchmarks, average bench 71% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 91.4 1-Core 100 2-Core 180 74% 124 Pts	4-Core 309 8-Core 501 50% 405 Pts	64-Core 507 31% 507 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M4000 9,043 User benchmarks, average bench 32% Nvidia(10DE 1153) ≥ 4GB CLim: 772 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	11.1% Very poor	Lighting 0.03 Reflection 39.2 Parallax 35.5 0% 24.9 fps	MRender 47.2 Gravity 35.4 Splatting 37.9 32% 40.2 fps
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 11.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD WD5000AZLX-00K4KA0 500GB 44,506 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 296GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 37 28 29 34 47 38 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	40.8% Average	Read 106 Write 119 Mixed 69.2 SusWrite 35.5 61% 82.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.6 124% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 40.8% Great: 104%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 313GB free Firmware: KC48 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 111 110 111 111 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	65.7% Good	Read 119 Write 117 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 110 74% 102 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 65.7% Great: 88%
SMI USB DISK 4GB 1,509 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 3GB free, PID 1000 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 6 6 6 6 6 MB/s Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	5.19% Terrible	Read 18.8 Write 4.8 Mixed 4.7 SusWrite 5.9 9% 8.55 MB/s	4K Read 5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 18% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.19% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451U7AFR8C HMT451U7BFR8C HMT451U7BFR8C HMT451U7AFR8C 16GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 1866, 1866, 1866, 1866 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	90.4% Outstanding	MC Read 34.1 MC Write 37 MC Mixed 34.3 100% 35.1 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 13.1 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 65.1 62% 65.1 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 90.4% Great: 94%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CELSIUS M730 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 14%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS M730

CPU
Xeon E5-1620 v2Intel $345Bench 71%, 10,301 samples	40x
Xeon E5-1650 v2Intel $635Bench 76%, 10,921 samples	9x
Xeon E5-2650 v2IntelBench 67%, 5,123 samples	6x

GPU
Quadro K4000NvidiaBench 13%, 11,114 samples	13x
NVS 310NvidiaBench 1%, 4,920 samples	7x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x

SSD
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	9x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
HG6 256GBToshibaBench 86%, 4,588 samples	4x

RAM
HMT451U6BFR8C 4x4GBHynixBench 70%, 26 samples	8x
M393B1G73QH0- 4x8GBSamsungBench 87%, 67 samples	4x
M393B2G70DB0- 2x16GBSamsungBench 57%, 461 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 55% - Above average

Total price: $440

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16