Toshiba WT10-A-102

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 8.33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics0.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (83%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemToshiba WT10-A-102  (all builds)
MotherboardType2 Type2 - Board Product Name
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '20 at 17:16
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 83%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Atom Z3735F
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.35 GHz, turbo 1.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
8.33% Terrible
1-Core 13.4
2-Core 28.1
10% 20.8 Pts
4-Core 43.1
8-Core 50.7
6% 46.9 Pts
64-Core 44.4
3% 44.4 Pts
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.33%
Great: 14%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Bay Trail 0.667 - 0.854 GHz)
Toshiba(1179 F974) 1,017MB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.62% Terrible
Lighting 2
Reflection 2.2
Parallax 2.4
0% 2.2 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.9
Splatting 2.7
1% 2.5 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.62%
Great: 1%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
To be filled by O.E.M be filled by O.E.M 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
4.15% Terrible
MC Read 1.2
MC Write 1.8
MC Mixed 0.3
3% 1.1 GB/s
SC Read 0.1
SC Write 0.1
SC Mixed 0
0% 0.07 GB/s
Latency 182
22% 182 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 4.15%
Great: 22%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $146Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback