Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron G530-$36 3,833 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	52.5% Above average	Memory 86.3 1-Core 61.6 2-Core 123 57% 90.4 Pts	4-Core 111 8-Core 122 15% 116 Pts	64-Core 108 7% 108 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 52.5% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 400 1,018 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 0893) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.95 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.98% Terrible	Lighting 2.57 Reflection 3.31 Parallax 1.22 2% 2.36 fps	MRender 2.86 Gravity 1.83 Splatting 1.96 2% 2.22 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.98% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 101GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 105 127 124 119 123 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 72% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 1x2GB 198 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	22.6% Poor	MC Read 6.7 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 6.6 20% 6.83 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 5.6 18% 6.2 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 22.6% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 25%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i3-2120Intel $170Bench 51%, 77,810 samples	16x
Core i5-2400Intel $250Bench 61%, 166,255 samples	9x
Pentium G850Intel $118Bench 51%, 2,785 samples	8x

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	46x
GeForce GT 520NvidiaBench 2%, 16,336 samples	2x
HD 7870AMD $203Bench 26%, 42,130 samples	1x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	5x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 1x2GBMicronBench 24%, 198 samples	3x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	2x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x4GBHyperX $35Bench 51%, 38,490 samples	2x

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $198

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16