Packard imedia S3712

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.27% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPackard imedia S3712  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard imedia S3712
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090816
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateFeb 16 '20 at 07:30
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q8300-$115
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
36.8% Below average
Memory 57.8
1-Core 35.6
2-Core 70.1
35% 54.5 Pts
4-Core 93.8
8-Core 98
13% 95.9 Pts
64-Core 102
6% 102 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 85E7) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
3.27% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 3.58
Parallax 4.03
3% 3.74 fps
MRender 5.33
Gravity 3.5
Splatting 5.39
4% 4.74 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.27%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
134GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 178 203 214 191 210 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.6% Above average
Read 229
Write 165
Mixed 233
SusWrite 199
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 24.3
100% 33.2 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 92.1
DQ Mixed 188
126% 153 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 128%
Samsung HD502IJ 500GB-$40
24GB free
Firmware: 1AA01110
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 47 49 48 49 49 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.8% Poor
Read 44.2
Write 24.5
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 48.5
28% 38 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.8%
Great: 59%
Generic- SD/MMC 64GB
3GB free, PID 6362
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 17 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
16.8% Very poor
Read 18
Write 18.5
Mixed 17.7
SusWrite 17.1
24% 17.8 MB/s
4K Read 3.9
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 3.1
225% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 16.8%
Great: 23%
WDC WD50 00AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
299GB free, PID 0216
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 16 16 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 24
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 16.3
30% 22.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
100% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 20%
Seagate External 2TB
457GB free, PID 3332
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 17 16 17 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
6.04% Terrible
Read 9.5
Write 9
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 16.4
16% 11 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
20% 0.4 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 6.04%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
52028, 52028, 52028, 52028 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
15.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.7
MC Write 5.3
MC Mixed 5.3
14% 5.1 GB/s
SC Read 3.1
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 4.7
9% 3.3 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical imedia S3712 Builds (Compare 11 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S3712

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $59
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback