Toshiba PORTEGE Z30-C

Performance Results


Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 9% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	6.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	80% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU. CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.

System	Toshiba PORTEGE Z30-C (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA PORTEGE Z30-C
Memory	13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180205
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '20 at 23:41
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	MEX-User
Background CPU	56%
CPU Throttled	99%

PC Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6500U 102,213 User benchmarks, average bench 46% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.2% Good	Memory 81.1 1-Core 76 2-Core 138 60% 98.2 Pts	4-Core 264 8-Core 262 35% 263 Pts	64-Core 260 16% 260 Pts
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Toshiba(1179 0015) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7263 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	6.35% Terrible	Lighting 6.8 Reflection 8.65 Parallax 6.16 6% 7.2 fps	MRender 7.76 Gravity 6.13 Splatting 13.5 8% 9.12 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 6.35% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNLN256HCHP-00000 256GB 3,145 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 185GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT2100Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 284 277 286 295 297 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	80% Excellent	Read 418 Write 289 Mixed 247 SusWrite 286 69% 310 MB/s	4K Read 23.3 4K Write 55.8 4K Mixed 28.5 101% 35.9 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 278 DQ Mixed 242 204% 299 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 80% Great: 100%
WD My Passport 2626 2TB 8,368 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 1.5TB free, PID 2626 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 107 109 108 109 110 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	67.1% Good	Read 117 Write 102 Mixed 68.5 SusWrite 108 131% 98.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 8.6 4K Mixed 0.7 318% 3.27 MB/s	DQ Read 0.4 DQ Write 10 DQ Mixed 0.5 359% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 65%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GB 10,651 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	59.6% Above average	MC Read 21.1 MC Write 22.4 MC Mixed 19.3 60% 20.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.8 SC Write 21.6 SC Mixed 18.8 52% 18.1 GB/s	Latency 78.5 51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 59.6% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PORTEGE Z30-C Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba PORTEGE Z30-C

CPU
Core i5-6200UIntelBench 41%, 135,462 samples	67x
Core i7-6500UIntelBench 46%, 102,213 samples	43x
Core i7-6600UIntelBench 45%, 31,982 samples	34x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	175x

SSD
THNSNJ256G8NY 256GBToshibaBench 76%, 12,683 samples	25x
THNSNK256GVN8 256GBToshibaBench 64%, 2,371 samples	22x
MZNTY256HDHP-00000 256GBSamsungBench 87%, 2,168 samples	10x

RAM
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 27%, 39,427 samples	28x
M471B1G73QH0-YK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 28%, 40,451 samples	15x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 1x8GBHynixBench 28%, 77,702 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16