Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 65% Destroyer	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	63.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	171% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190403
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Feb 15 '20 at 20:43
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$102 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Memory 93.7 1-Core 126 2-Core 253 88% 158 Pts	4-Core 504 8-Core 754 78% 629 Pts	64-Core 740 46% 740 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$300 180,577 User benchmarks, average bench 59% Gigabyte(1458 401A) CLim: 2280 MHz, MLim: 3079 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.20 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	63.7% Good	Lighting 83.9 Reflection 84.1 Parallax 75.2 68% 81.1 fps	MRender 68.8 Gravity 75.4 Splatting 59.3 55% 67.8 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 63.7% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 251GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 914 862 854 858 843 833 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	171% Outstanding	Read 1,206 Write 1,068 Mixed 1,045 SusWrite 861 235% 1,045 MB/s	4K Read 37.8 4K Write 126 4K Mixed 67.8 211% 77.2 MB/s	DQ Read 43.9 DQ Write 106 DQ Mixed 66.3 53% 72.1 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 171% Great: 355%
Crucial M550 256GB-$152 8,333 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 238GB free Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 420 417 429 427 430 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	85% Excellent	Read 406 Write 429 Mixed 303 SusWrite 420 88% 390 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 86.5 4K Mixed 35.5 125% 48.1 MB/s	DQ Read 23.5 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 179 113% 123 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 85% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GB-$42 131,007 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	MC Read 33.1 MC Write 33.2 MC Mixed 23.2 85% 29.8 GB/s	SC Read 18.5 SC Write 33.7 SC Mixed 25.5 74% 25.9 GB/s	Latency 60.6 66% 60.6 ns
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 95%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B360-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 2,022 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING - $105

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	537x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	255x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	251x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	217x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	146x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	105x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	90x
660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBIntel $60Bench 156%, 162,275 samples	84x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	45x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	127x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	72x
BLS8G4D26BFSBK.8FD 2x8GBCrucialBench 82%, 12,603 samples	54x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $634

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16