Medion ERAZER i73000_256/C177

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics30.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
SystemMedion ERAZER i73000_256/C177  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H110H4-EM
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160304
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '20 at 16:13
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-6700-$296
1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
70.7% Very good
1-Core 112
2-Core 218
78% 165 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 571
60% 471 Pts
64-Core 575
39% 575 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
MSI(1462 3203) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
30.6% Below average
Lighting 126
Reflection 105
Parallax 116
33% 115 fps
MRender 81.9
Gravity 111
Splatting 75.4
31% 89.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 35%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY256HDHP-00000 256GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAT2100Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 112 126 126 137 106 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
80.1% Excellent
Read 441
Write 396
Mixed 301
SusWrite 143
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 35.3
4K Write 91.7
4K Mixed 46.2
161% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 41
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 57.4
50% 72.6 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 109%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 99 103 103 98 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
58% Above average
Read 102
Write 74.5
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 99.6
63% 85 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
181% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 58%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M378A1G43DB0-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
69.3% Good
MC Read 25.7
MC Write 27.1
MC Mixed 21
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 24.8
SC Mixed 20.6
58% 20.2 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 78%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical ERAZER i73000_256/C177 Builds (Compare 5 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

System: Medion ERAZER i73000_256/C177

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 56% - Above average Total price: $494
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback