| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
| Graphics | 35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (46%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20160119 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 15 '20 at 08:28 |
| Run Duration | 139 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 46% |
PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
38.9%
Below average
|
36% 66 Pts
|
26% 192 Pts
|
13% 214 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.1
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
35%
Below average
|
29% 50.7 fps
|
46% 57.1 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
770GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 137 142 134 132 88 MB/s
|
87.3%
Excellent
|
96% 132 MB/s
|
115% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown CT102464BD160 Corsair CMV8GX3M1A160 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
|
36.1%
Below average
|
40% 14.1 GB/s
|
16% 5.5 GB/s
|
22% 180 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-F2A78M-HD2 Builds (Compare 248 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-F2A78M-HD2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| A8-7650K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 44%, 15,487 samples | 30x |
| A8-7600 APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 42%, 31,243 samples | 27x |
| Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 27x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 28x |
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 22x |
| Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 12x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 85% - Excellent | Total price: $88 |