| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus PRIME A320M-K (all builds) |
| Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20180820 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Feb 15 '20 at 08:11 |
| Run Duration | 124 Seconds |
| Run User | JPN-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
73.9%
Very good
|
70% 126 Pts
|
64% 515 Pts
|
52% 842 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.87
|
28.3%
Poor
|
29% 31.7 fps
|
28% 34.1 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$36
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 99 101 111 110 113 MB/s
|
61.2%
Good
|
70% 95.2 MB/s
|
159% 1.07 MB/s
| |
|
ST320LT0 12-9WS14C 320GB
39GB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 50 51 50 48 MB/s
|
19.8%
Very poor
|
61% 45.6 MB/s
|
39% 0.53 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (31st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39.4%
Below average
|
38% 13.2 GB/s
|
40% 14 GB/s
|
40% 99.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,049 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 1,463x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 1,307x |
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 1,006x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 949x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 735x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 654x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 97% - Outstanding | Total price: $357 |