HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemHP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 838F
Memory7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190418
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '20 at 07:16
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
47.6% Average
1-Core 63.1
2-Core 152
49% 108 Pts
4-Core 278
8-Core 472
47% 375 Pts
64-Core 507
34% 507 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
HP(103C 838F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
30.5% Below average
Lighting 112
Reflection 71.6
Parallax 103
29% 95.3 fps
MRender 79.3
Gravity 112
Splatting 77.6
31% 89.6 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 33%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$86
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 5,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 1,528
Write 831
Mixed 879
238% 1,079 MB/s
4K Read 45.8
4K Write 83.5
4K Mixed 58.4
188% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 987
DQ Write 622
DQ Mixed 754
576% 788 MB/s
Poor: 113% Great: 237%
Seagate SSD 1TB
58GB free
Firmware: ST8S1024
SusWrite @10s intervals: 403 421 209 363 438 274 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 454
Write 432
Mixed 371
SusWrite 351
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 49.5
4K Mixed 33.6
113% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 223
197% 295 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 113%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 499GB
102GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 50 59 53 54 62 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
27.8% Poor
Read 43.3
Write 54.8
Mixed 19.3
SusWrite 53.4
31% 42.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 99%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$70
46GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 114 123 125 129 131 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 49.5
Write 67.5
Mixed 60
SusWrite 122
55% 74.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.3
114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 70%
Jmicron Generic 1TB
130GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 118 110 112 114 99 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 110
Write 114
Mixed 31
SusWrite 110
66% 91.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.6
123% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
68.9% Good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 21.6
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.2
SC Write 20.4
SC Mixed 18.9
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 78%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx Builds (Compare 9,839 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Jet ski

System: HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-ce0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i7-9700K $349Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia RTX 2060 $330Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $82SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $683SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback