Fujitsu FMVNQ7PE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.2% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive48.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemFujitsu FMVNQ7PE  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB24B
Memory1.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '20 at 00:33
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3427U
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
45.9% Average
Memory 80.4
1-Core 24.8
2-Core 47.2
38% 50.8 Pts
4-Core 65.6
8-Core 95.4
10% 80.5 Pts
64-Core 86.6
5% 86.6 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 16C1) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4252
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.2% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.73
Parallax 0.91
1% 1.32 fps
MRender 1.76
Gravity 0.73
Splatting 2.43
1% 1.64 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.2%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZMTE128HMGR-00007 128GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT4206Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 97 96 101 111 95 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 402
Write 127
Mixed 138
SusWrite 103
42% 192 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 19.3
4K Mixed 15.7
58% 17.9 MB/s
DQ Read 230
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 57.1
77% 142 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 1x4GB
1 of 1 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
24.6% Poor
MC Read 8.5
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 7.1
23% 8.03 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6
SC Mixed 5.4
16% 5.77 GB/s
Latency 79.8
50% 79.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback