HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.5% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 8.1 is the second most recent version of Windows but it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
SystemHP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 3396
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime5.5 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '20 at 18:35
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-3770-$190
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
68.3% Good
1-Core 102
2-Core 200
71% 151 Pts
4-Core 378
8-Core 521
59% 450 Pts
64-Core 522
35% 522 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GT 1030
MSI(1462 8C98) 2GB
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 525 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Lighting 48.1
Reflection 36.3
Parallax 46.7
13% 43.7 fps
MRender 12.9
Gravity 51.9
Splatting 43.3
13% 36 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 16%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$32
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 294 141 150 299 156 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
68% Good
Read 245
Write 102
Mixed 312
SusWrite 199
48% 215 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 30.6
108% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 231
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 173
162% 246 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 68%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
573GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 142 130 131 139 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Read 150
Write 136
Mixed 101
SusWrite 137
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
212% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 107%
WD Elements 25A2 500GB
195GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 27 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
16.3% Very poor
Read 32.2
Write 23.7
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 26.2
35% 26.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.3%
Great: 56%
WDC WD50 00AVDS-63U7B1 500GB
1GB free, PID 0216
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 31.8
Write 22.7
Mixed 22
31% 25.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
42% 0.5 MB/s
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1600EL Series 029E CML4GX3M1A1600C9 Kingston 9905403-197.A00LF 830B NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.6 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 16.7
46% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 51%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical Compaq Elite 8300 CMT Builds (Compare 4,695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: HP Compaq Elite 8300 CMT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $251
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $146Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9600K $210Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $505Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $249
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback