Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 149%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 129%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (91st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 9 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics162% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170711
Uptime2 Days
Run DateFeb 14 '20 at 18:09
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7740X-$130
LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 143
2-Core 263
94% 167 Pts
4-Core 498
8-Core 770
78% 634 Pts
64-Core 791
49% 791 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
EVGA(3842 2382) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
162% Outstanding
Lighting 225
Reflection 236
Parallax 229
183% 230 fps
MRender 264
Gravity 222
Splatting 145
165% 210 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 162%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
154GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 283 322 323 323 306 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 459
Mixed 379
SusWrite 316
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 67
230% 83.5 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 359
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 126%
Great: 124%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
156GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 285 334 333 333 333 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
99.7% Outstanding
Read 409
Write 330
Mixed 302
SusWrite 321
76% 340 MB/s
4K Read 29.6
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 45.9
171% 67.8 MB/s
DQ Read 180
DQ Write 311
DQ Mixed 182
156% 224 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 99.7%
Great: 97%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
142GB free
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 210 251 270 245 236 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 431
Write 246
Mixed 268
SusWrite 237
66% 296 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 123
4K Mixed 14.8
116% 52.8 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 23.3
68% 143 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 74%
Samsung 860 Pro 1TB-$300
914GB free
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 357 428 434 436 441 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 457
Mixed 431
SusWrite 408
100% 442 MB/s
4K Read 47.2
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 67.5
233% 85.3 MB/s
DQ Read 387
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 360
272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 132%
Great: 132%
Samsung 860 Pro 2TB-$474
1.5TB free
Firmware: RVM02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 354 357 428 434 436 441 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
131% Outstanding
Read 471
Write 458
Mixed 434
SusWrite 408
100% 443 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 67.1
227% 83.2 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 344
DQ Mixed 359
271% 363 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 131%
Great: 131%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2400 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
82.9% Excellent
MC Read 29.8
MC Write 31.3
MC Mixed 25.7
83% 28.9 GB/s
SC Read 19.6
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 26.5
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 82.9%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,651 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $795
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback