PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 78.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5 (all builds) |
Memory | 12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20100311 |
Uptime | 0.1 Days |
Run Date | Feb 14 '20 at 17:11 |
Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 1% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
81.3%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.19
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
42.5%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung MZ7LN512HMJP-000L7 512GB
96GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MAV01L6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 184 205 230 226 126 MB/s
|
78.4%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 6 slots used
16GB DIMM
|
58.9%
Above average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples | 209x |
Xeon X5675IntelBench 75%, 8,072 samples | 48x |
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 30x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 33x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 30x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 24x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 53% - Above average | Total price: $390 |